NOTE :

We are currently translating the 2009-2010 "Medical Management of HIV Infection" into a web-ready format. We will post each chapter as it is completed. To make any comments or suggestions click here

Previous         48         Next
dkfhkd

Discussion Thread

TABLE 2-16:

Routine Laboratory Tests (Continued)

Test Cost* Frequency and Comment
PPD test or
interferongamma
release
assay
$1 Test at baseline. Annual testing should be considered in previously PPD-negative patients who have risk for tuber - culosis, and repeat testing should be considered if initial test was negative and the CD4 count has subsequently increased to >200 cells/mm3 in response to HAART.
Urine NAAT–N. gonorrhoeae & C. trachomatis (or alternate test) in sexually active patients** $60 to $100 Recommended by CDC HIV prevention guidelines for "consideration" in sexually active patients (MMWR 2003;52(RR-12):1-24). Advocated as marker of high risk behavior (and need for enhanced counseling) and for treatment + contact tracing. Repeat annually in sexually active patients. and more often in high-risk patients (see pg 49) (NAAT=nucleic acid amplification test).
Urinalysis   Assessment is especially important in African -Americans and those with co-morbidities :diabetes, hypertension or hepatitis C. If 1+ proteinuria – need 24 hour urine protein.
General Health Screens
Mammography   Indicated annually in women >50 years
Colonoscopy   Indicated in patients >50 years
Prostrate-specific
antigen
  Men > 50 years
Bone densometry   Patients with risk factors for osteoporosis MRI for patients with hip pain

*Common charges are based on survey of five laboratories.
** Recommendations of Primary Care Guidelines of IDSA (Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:609).

as AZT, and in those with marginal or low counts. 

Serum Chemistry Panel: This panel is advocated in the initial evaluation of HIV infection due to high rates of baseline hepatic disease (J Infect Dis 2002;186:231),to assess renal function and nutritional status, and to obtain baseline values in patients who are likely to have multisystem disease due to HIV or its treatment. Up to 75% of HIVinfected patients have abnormal transaminases at baseline and 20% have severe abnormalities (JAIDS 1994;7:1134).

Syphilis Serology (MMWR 2006;55[RR-1]:22): Screen with a nontreponemal test (VDRL or RPR) at baseline and annually thereafter in sexually active patients due to high rates of co-infection. Up to 6% of patients with HIV infection have biologic false-positive (BFP) screening tests. Some labs now screen with treponema EIA tests which detects persons with untreated or incompletely treated syphilis (Infect Med 2004;21:399). False positives may occur so confirmatory tests are necessary. With RPR or VDRL, risk factors for biologic falsepositive results include injection drug use, pregnancy, and HIV infection (CID 1994;19:1040; JID 1992;165:1124; JAIDS 1994;7:1134; Am J Med 1995;99:55). In one review of 300,000 VDRLs, the rate of biologic false positives was 2.1% in persons with HIV compared to 0.24% in those

Chapter 2: Laboratory Tests

Page 48 of 58 (0 Posts)

Add Thread | View All Threads

 

ImagesThreadsNamePostsDate

No Threads...