NOTE :

We are currently translating the 2009-2010 "Medical Management of HIV Infection" into a web-ready format. We will post each chapter as it is completed. To make any comments or suggestions click here

Previous         45         Next
dkfhkd

Discussion Thread

Sequential analysis demonstrates that transmitted virus is almost always R5 virus, even when the source has D/M-tropic virus (Ann Revmuno 2003; 21:265). Therefore, patients with early HIV infection typically have R5 virus. With progressive disease, a shift to D/M-tropic virus can occur (Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:591). Patients with extensive treatment experience or rapid progression have a higher frequency of X4 virus, but pure X4 populations are rare (J Infect Dis 2005;191:806; Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:591; J Infect Dis 2006;194:926). The presence of X4 virus is associated with more rapid clinical progression but does not alter response to standard therapy (CID 2008;46:1617). 

TABLE 2-15:

Prevalence of R5, D/M, and X4 viruses in patients with HIV infection

Source Treatment N R5 D/M X4
JID 2005; 192:466 Naïve 979 82% 18% < 1%
JID 2005; 191:866 Naïve 462 81% 18% < 1%
CID 2007; 44:591 Experienced 391 50% 46% 4%
Viral Entry 2007;3:10 Experienced 2,560 56% 41% 3%

Available Assays: There are two high-throughput phenotypic assays: Phenoscript (VIRalliance, Paris, France) and Trofile (Monogram Biosciences, Inc., San Francisco CA). Only the Trofile is currently available, a viral load of ≥1000 c/mL is required, the cost $1,960/test and the turnaround time is about 2 weeks (see www.trofileassay.com or call 1-800- 777-0177). The indication for the test is consideration of use of a CCR5 antagonist, since the drug should be used only in patients with pure R5 tropism. In MOTIVATE 1 and 2 the number of treatment experienced patients with exclusive R5 virus was 56% of 2560 screened participants. The infrequency of R5 virus exclusively correlated with CD4 count: It was 76% in 129 patients with CD4 counts >400/mm3 and 40% for patients with <50/mm3. Treatment with maraviroc (MVC) in this subset showed a mean 1.96 log10 c/mL reduction in VL at 24 weeks compared to < 1.0 log10 c/mL reduction in those who received only the optimized background regimen (Nelson M and Lalezari J, et al. 14th CROI 2007, Los Angeles, CA, Abst. 104 A and B). Although all participants had to have R5 tropism at screening to enter the trial, 8% were found to have D/M virus on a second tropism assay at baseline (start of therapy). The virologic response to MVC therapy was poor in those patients. Retrospective analysis using the enhanced Tophile assay (see pg 46) fould an additional. Attempts to measure tropism using cheaper genotype methods have so far been unsuccessful because of limited sensitivity (15th CROI 2008, Boston, MA, Abstr. 920A).

Accuracy of the assay is limited by detection of minority variants. The initial Trofile assay showed 100% specificity for variants present at 10% of the population, but the initial sensitivity of this test fell to 85% for variants making up 5% of the population. (Antimicrob Ag Chemother 2007; 51:566; J Clin Micro 2007;45:279). An "enhanced tropism assay"from Trophile was

Chapter 2: Laboratory Tests

Page 45 of 58 (0 Posts)

Add Thread | View All Threads

 

ImagesThreadsNamePostsDate

No Threads...